Page 247 - 20211214_OHKF_Health_Finance_Research_Report_E (1)
P. 247

Test procedural combination and test result grouping

                             The Hong Kong Reference Framework for Diabetes Care for Adults in Primary Care Settings
                             (2018) suggests that either FPG or HbA1c tests can be sufficient with added OGTT for
                             diagnosis of DM (PHO, 2018). Internationally, protocols for DM diagnoses recommend using
                             combinations of the three above tests. However, due to inherent differences in the respective
                             tests, there has been substantial debate over the preference of each. For example, while the
                             OGTT is a diagnostic test, it is also more costly and time-consuming and therefore is
                             not recommended in the first round of screening. To be most definitive, the
                             OGTT should be performed to offer an actual clinical diagnosis of
                             diabetes.


                             FPG and HbA1c are therefore the recommended candidates for the first round of screening.
                             The HbA1c test is the most common screening test due to its low cost and ease of
                             administration, given that it can be stored at ambient temperatures and administered at any
                             time of the day without requiring fasting random blood samples (Lim et al., 2018). However,
                             the HbA1c test’s measurement can be affected by a variety of genetic, haematologic and
                             illness-related factors (FHB, 2018; Gallagher et al., 2009). Alternatively, the FPG test can be
                             administered through measurement of fasting blood glucose levels and therefore difficult to
                             achieve on a mass population screening level. Furthermore, due to conflicting evidence
                             internationally on the test performance of FPG and HbA1c, there remains conflict over the
                             use of only one of the two tests alone to assess pre-diabetes or DM diagnosis (Appendix R).
                             (Barry et al., 2017)


                             In view of this, our prospective screening programme proposes aligning with the
                             recommendation stipulated under the Hong Kong Reference Framework for Diabetes Care
                             for Adults in Primary Care Settings (2018) with the added component of combining the FPG
                             and HbA1c tests. In combining the FPG and HbA1c tests, we propose that we may partly
                             overcome the associated inaccuracies within each screening test. Additionally, we may be
                             able to better estimate the cost to improve diagnosis accuracy and provide the necessary
                             treatment protocols to patients.

                             Therefore, the screening programme shall consist of at least one round of
                             screening: with one mandatory round of combined FPG & HbA1c tests,
                             followed by either a repeat of both or both tests in addition to OGTT
                             if patients fall into the thresholds for either DM or prediabetes. All calculations for the
                             economic projection model will therefore follow the current FHB protocol for prediabetes or
                             DM diagnosis with the additional component of combining FPG + HbA1c tests.































                                                                                                               245
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252