Page 59 - 20211214_OHKF_Health_Finance_Research_Report_E (1)
P. 59

Public-private mixed systems

                             Australia: Experiences in providing financial incentives for more coordinated,
                             multidisciplinary chronic disease management in primary healthcare

                             In Australia, prioritising the prevention and management of chronic diseases in PHC has
                             continually been on the national policy agenda over the past two decades (Cant & Foster,
                             2011). The country’s national health insurance, or Medicare, has allowed for population-wide
                             access to PHC, and policy reform over the years has created greater incentives to providers
                             for making PHC more coordinated and patient-centred.


                             Medicare provides universal health insurance and is financed through general tax revenue
                             and a government levy (Commonwealth Fund, 2020a). Both inpatient and outpatient care are
                             funded through the Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS). The MBS includes a schedule of
                             subsidised Medicare services and over time has changed with respect to the country’s
                             changing health burden profile. In particular, the MBS has expanded over time to include
                             incentives for healthcare providers to deliver more coordinated, multidisciplinary PHC with
                             allied health professionals (Rural Health West & WAPHA, 2020).


                             Financial incentives to improve the quality of healthcare have been used both past and
                             present in Australia. In 1999, the Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) programme allowed for GPs
                             to receive incentives if providers conducted routine health assessments and developed
                             tailored chronic disease management care plans for people aged 65 and over, or for
                             Indigenous Australians aged 45 and over (Cant & Foster, 2011; Wilkinson et al., 2002). By
                             2004, the EPC expanded so that GPs could refer patients to private allied health
                             professionals with all costs continuing to be subsidised by MBS (Mason, 2013). In 2013,
                             these expanded services eventually became the Medicare-Plus Chronic Disease
                             Management services and are aimed in enhancing chronic disease management
                             among eligible recipients of services (Australian Government Department of Health, 2014).


                             Since 2019, the Australian Department of Health has provided financial incentives to GPs
                             through the Practice Incentive Program (PIP). PIP supports GPs in enhancing continuity and
                             capacity of care through eight types of incentives that each target a specific target
                             population (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2020). These incentives for target
                             populations include after hours; eHealth; aged care access; Indigenous health; procedural
                             GP; quality improvement; rural loading; and teaching (Rural Health West & WAPHA, 2020).
                             Private practices that meet the PIP guidelines for providing team-based care are eligible to
                             receive subsidies for continuing those services. Certain services include prioritisation of
                             chronic disease management. For example, the PIP Indigenous Health Initiative
                             (IHI) supports GPs in delivering routine chronic disease management to Aboriginal and/or
                             Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) individuals aged 15 years and over (Rural Health West & WAPHA,
                             2020). Financial incentives are not standardised payments but are categorised based on the
                             specific service offered, including one-off sign-on payments, registration payments for each
                             new patient, and 2-tiered payments based on outcomes when health outcomes and quality
                             of care are met (Rural Health West & WAPHA, 2020). Practices are required to meet the
                             requirements of community sensitivity training for the specific PIP target population, including
                             cultural awareness training for those who apply for the IHI PIP.

                             Through PIP, not only are healthcare providers incentivised to deliver more tailored,
                             team-based care for chronic disease management, but target populations benefit from
                             receiving affordable quality of care.











                                                                                                                57
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64