Page 210 - 20211214_OHKF_Health_Finance_Research_Report_E (1)
P. 210

5    Patients with HDH and/or conditions co-morbid with HDH may require the use of
                 medication as part of their management regime. Within the Scheme, we propose that
                 the Government and purchaser consider the provision of medication for
                 management with either generic medications (such as those available
                 for patients in the public sector) or brand-name medication from
                 private sector doctors. For the latter option, we implore the Government and
                 purchaser to consider offering subsidies or employ a co-payment option
                 to ensure financial affordability of the medication.


                 5.1  We acknowledge that many patients who have traditionally relied on HA services
                     may prefer the lower pricing of medications available in the HA; vice versa,
                     patients visiting private sector doctors may prefer the use of brand-name drugs.
                     To incentivise patients to remain in the private sector for continuous chronic
                     disease management that includes prescription of medications, we propose that
                     both options should be available for patients within the Scheme.

                 5.2  Our economic projections (Chapter 4.3) accounted for the cost of medications
                     when calculating the cost of disease management and showed that even when
                     medication is fully subsidised by the Government, there are likely to be cost
                     savings to the health system, thereby increasing the feasibility of offering subsidies
                     for medication purchase.

            5.3  THE GOVERNMENT MUST CONSIDER

                    KEY POLICY DIMENSIONS TO ENSURE
                    EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF

                    STRATEGIC PURCHASING


            In moving our health system towards one that is fit-for-purpose, in addition to implementing
            the Scheme as a specific example of applying strategic purchasing to purchasing primary
            care, we additionally propose that further efforts be made to strengthen the strategic vision
            of this Scheme. In keeping with the synthesised elements of the various strategic purchasing
            definitions (Figure 5.3) (Klasa et al., 2018), we recommend that additional policy dimensions
            be considered to complement strategic purchasing efforts as listed below:

            Element 1:
            Population health, as indicated by information sharing systems

            To ensure that policy decisions related to the Scheme are based upon the latest population
            health data and information on past provider and purchaser performance, it is critical to
            ensure that information sharing systems are in place.

            1.   First recommended in our 2018 report, there is a need to invest in 21st century
                 information architecture, which is essential for facilitating continuity of care as patients
                 navigate across different care settings, such as between public and private sectors. We
                 recommend that the Government further leverage and strengthen existing
                 infrastructure, such as the Electronic Health Record Sharing System
                 (eHRSS) to better link patients with various providers. At the same time, leveraging the
                 eHRSS allows policymakers to more systematically track population health needs, as
                 regular population needs assessments are necessary to ensure that policies fill existing
                 gaps in the system.








       208
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215